Search for: "United States v. Harris"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
Recently, six well-respected former federal judges wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, asking the Senate to "establish an improved process for the consideration of judicial nominations by the United States Senate. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:54 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:52 am
While thecourt “retains case-by-case discretion over whether toapply waiver,” Harris Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:05 am
District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
& A. 1943) (stating in a will context Such burden does not shi [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
” Ambrose Harris v.Ricci, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
He was a law clerk to United States District Judges Richard A. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Harris, 13-817, and KBR, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
(rescheduled before the Oct. 9, Oct. 16, Oct. 30, Nov. 6, Nov. 13, Nov. 20, Dec. 4 and Dec. 11 conferences; relisted after the Jan. 8, Jan. 15, Jan. 22, Feb. 19, Feb. 26, March 5, March 19, March 26 and April 1 conferences) Harris v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
” And at ACSblog, Catherine Fisk weighs in on last month’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] Harris Brumfield, Trustee for Ascent Trust v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Sebelius case, from the United States District Court for Arizona, dated May 5, 2011. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:47 pm
United States, 20-6387, involving prohibitions on delay in prosecution of criminal cases; three-time relist Allen v. [read post]
