Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 4,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 4:55 pm
LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 3:16 am
Justice Platkin’s valuation ruling last month in Matter of Digeser v Flach [Gould Erectors & Rigging, Inc.], 2017 NY Slip Op 50220(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. 31, 2017], is the culmination of an oppressed minority shareholder dissolution petition filed in April 2013. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:44 am
Yesterday’s argument in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
Supreme Court ruled in Fry v Napoleon Community Schools Docket No. 15-497, 580 U. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:17 am
S. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:26 am
McGuireWoods, LLP, 2017 IL App (1st) 160294-U (Ill. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
The government of Mexico’s brief argues that “Mexico has a responsibility to maintain control over its territory and to look after the well-being of its nationals. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
An earlier post on this blog, examining a post-trial decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], described the minority shareholder’s dissolution claim under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law as a “classic case of minority shareholder oppression. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
That story did not end particularly well for all aboard. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:10 pm
Tupy) an en banc rehearing of the court’s initial decision in the case of Markel Interests, LLC, et al., v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
Narcotics Agents, 403 U. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
“U-K-A-S-E. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am
Although we agree that “the Government’s interest in combating terrorism is an urgent objective of the highest order,” Holder v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
"As we explained in Johnson v Eisentrager, 339 U. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
We must hew to our standard of review.The municipal court and the Law Division each admitted as Exhibit S–4 the following tweet allegedly posted by defendant on December 28, 2012: `No need for me to keep responding to ya stupid unhappy fake mole having ass.. how u cring in a corner with a shoe to ya face bitch. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
Sanders v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
” Parties’ Conflicting Submissions Warrant Evidentiary Hearing of Minority Shareholder’s Dissolution Petition Kocak v Dargin, 2017 NY Slip Op 30051(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 4, 2017]. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Bédard, 2016 QCCA 807 [21] En conséquence, l’inférence tirée par le juge voulant que les intimés aient agi suivant l’avis reçu du sergent Girard constitue une erreur de droit qui commande l’intervention de la Cour. [read post]
