Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 7,621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 9:36 am
Smith Corp., 751 F.2d 1226, 1236 (Fed. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:10 am
If you have any questions about the voting leave laws applicable to your workforce, contact an experienced Reed Smith Labor and Employment attorney. _______________________________________________ [1] AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, GA, HI, IA, IL, KS, KY, MA, MD, MN, MO, ND, NE, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, SD, TN, TX, UT, WV, WI, and WY. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:54 am
This issue was recently addressed in Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:35 am
In Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Inorporation [sic] & Ors [2020] EWHC 29 (Ch) (17 January 2020), Marcus Smith J dismissed the defendant 's application in which it sought to get out of a trial (due later this year, listed for five days) to determine the terms of a FRAND licence. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am
R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
When I wrote my critique of Judge Selna’s subsequently vacated Decision, I focused almost entirely on his top-down analysis; but indicated I might return to assess the other methods of FRAND rate determination and his analysis of them.Top-down is fundamentally flawed for two reasons, and thirdly, Judge Selna’s corresponding determinations were biased and erroneous in his application of the methodology.Firstly, the selected aggregate royalty rate caps—of 6 to 10 percent for… [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 5:16 am
It’s worth noting, however, that such claims may be difficult to prove, as certain defenses, such as the application of the de minimis rule, can prevent a lawsuit entirely. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
This is a system designed to encourage mistakes.[12] Instead, we should demand the utmost candor in warrant applications. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:27 am
Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 2, three interlocutory applications filed in three defamation cases. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
In Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) (see our blog here) the defendant blogger’s public interest defence failed because he did not adequately plead and prove that he had believed it was in the public interest to publish the statement complained of. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
” Retina-X requires “[t]echnical measures to secure Respondents’ web applications and mobile applications and address well-known and reasonably foreseeable vulnerabilities. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:44 pm
Smith, 248 N.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:39 am
Malouf Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc. (082502) Does the two-year statute of limitations, applicable to claims under the Workers’ Compensation Act, apply to claims by medical providers for the payment of services rendered to injured employees? [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:51 am
An interesting article from solicitor David Smith on LinkedIn suggests that the government may not be entirely happy with Liverpool who rushed their scheme in five years ago in order to avoid changed rules on permission. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Rehana Ahmed-Saucedo, Sonal Singh, and Feng Liu-Smith. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Smith that the free exercise clause generally requires no religious exemptions from laws that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 12:00 PM ET, Reed Smith will be hosting “Digital Health 101”, a CLE webinar covering: Federal and state health care regulatory and reimbursement issues, including fraud and abuse implications and insurance coverage for digital health devices and services Applicability of federal and state privacy laws, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), California Consumer… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:49 am
Author Basher Eyre# Lixnxw CC BY-SA 2.0 Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mt Justice Marcus Smith) Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Inc and others [2020] EWHC 29 (Ch) (17 Jan 2020) This was an application by Asustek Computer Inc. and its subsidiaries, Asustek (UK) Ltd. and Asus Technology Pte Limited. for an order that they cease to be parties to proceedings to determine the [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:32 am
In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019. [read post]
