Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 11,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2021, 3:19 am
Gutnick responded with a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a valid claim. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
A few random thoughts on the cases after the jump. 1) These cases, along with last month’s Already LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am
And those States have non-compete laws that are interesting and nuanced.But E.T. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 8:38 am
While this is true for all parents, adults who have a child custody agreement have a few more details to keep in mind when thinking about moving to a new city, town, state, or country. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 12:01 pm
In this first part, Professors Wildermuth and Watts argue that an important impact of the decision is the genesis of a framework for evaluating state standing based on the interest of the state at stake in the litigation. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
Senior officials and other powerful interests within the agency don’t like being investigated or even second-guessed. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
 It took the EPA about five years to write the rules for the acid rain program, and it only covered a few hundred facilities. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:47 am
” A few weeks ago, the IMF published its FSAP review of the United States, covering banking, insurance and securities. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Very few states have penalized the crime of aggression, but they may begin to do so in the event that the crime of aggression is added to the ICC Statute. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:51 pm
An interesting issue we've been coming across in contract negotiations over the past few months are the different retainage mandates of the states for private and public contracts. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The IP High Court of Japan said in its judgment on FRAND issues in the 2014 Apple v Samsung case (English translations of the judgments are available here) that relatively few public opinions (invited by the court, as reported earlier in IPKat) suggested that the court should apply the Antimonopoly Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am
As IPKat readers will know, a few weeks ago the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited judgment in Google v Oracle. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:45 pm
We've talked in the past about just how hard it is to state a regulatory takings claim under the Supreme Court's decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:53 am
“Okay, cousin, let me ask you a few questions,” I began. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:14 am
Although there have been a few glancing blows to the coverage defense, New York case law still does not require insurers to show prejudice in order to sustain disclaimers based on late notice of an occurrence or loss.2. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
” The Court also heavily relied on campaign finance cases decided in the last few years, such as Citizens United v FEC and Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v Bennett. [read post]
