Search for: "In Re Levine"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 1,877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:14 pm
At the suggestion of Ordinary Gentleman Rufus F., I undertook to read Chris Hedges’ new book The Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Special Backgrounder Compilation of Selected Stories Legal Hold and Preservation at Center of Apple/Samsung Battle - http://bit.ly/OXA172 (Jim McGann) Samsung, Apple Spar Over Gadgets' Specs | Reuters - http://reut.rs/OKmFvC (Dan Levine, Edwin Chin) Australian Patent Dispute: Apple v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am
Chikindas's Facebook-posted anti-Semitism has nothing to do with his field of food science, so it would seem that "institutional discipline" -- which would include suspension, but not administrative re-assignment -- should be barred on academic freedom grounds. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
” In re Urban Renewal (City of Detroit v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:40 pm
When you read this stuff you're saying five years from now, you're going to cringe in embarrassment like the rest of us are doing as we speak. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Claims under Federal and State Racketeering Acts And Other Civil Remedies There are three types approaches to civil remedies a defendant might pursue to inhibit the flow of false claims in products cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Aside from Youngkin each are facing re-election fights this year. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
They're also not interested in growth at all costs. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am
(PS – she comes from California and lives on a boat – so gets my vote on that…res ipsa loquitur on the California point.) [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In last week’s post, we explored how the 1994 investigation into OJ Simpson offered an excellent real-world example of how the exigent circumstances doctrine worked in the first moments of a high-profile homicide investigation. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
They’re Now Facing a Possible Collapse. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
EEO/iNews = News Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Insurance coverage law continued to evolve through 2016. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
Lawyers seem unable to master the art of cross-examination. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
California – California Lawmakers Can’t Take Lobbyist Donations – Unless They’re Running for Congress MSN – Julia Wick, Anabel Sosa, and Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 2/24/2024 State law forbids California lobbyists from donating to the campaigns of state lawmakers. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals said it will not re-examine a decision that overturned many of Alaska’s most important limits on campaign contributions. [read post]