Search for: "In re Gamble"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 1:38 pm
Nearly three years after passage, we're still learning about its failures and abuses. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 10:45 pm
("I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in (Casablanca)!) [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:07 pm
Cf: RSA Chapter 647:2 (gambling offenses); see generally, In Re Advisory Letter No. 3-11, 215 N.J. 495, 515 (N.J. 2013) (sitting judge could not perform as a comedian and actor under a stage name when the substance of his performances created an appearance of impropriety). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
(Docket Report) Third District Court rules false marking statute is not unconstitutional – N D Illinois decision in Luka v Proctor and Gamble Company (Docket Report) BPAI: Deficient means-plus-function claims broadened in patent reexamination: Ex Parte Avid Identifications Systems Inc (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps InnovaSystems – InnovaSystems requests re-examination after being held in contempt for violating injunction… [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
Today, in what is clearly an era of increasing deregulation, there may be entrepreneurs who are willing to gamble that violations will not be detected by undermanned regulators or that technical rules will not be enforced closely. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 10:47 am
The company, CSGO Lotto Inc., runs an online virtual currency gambling website. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
I know what you’re thinking, but I swear it really is true… banks actually used to “FAIL. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Masteralexis, If you’re hurt, where is home? [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
I know what you’re thinking, but I swear it really is true… banks actually used to “FAIL.” Don’t laugh at me, I’m serious. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
When combined with the substantial proposed re-write of the HSR notification requirements announced last month,[2] the impact on merging parties will likely be significant additional time and expense needed to achieve antitrust approval generally and a tendency toward greater opposition to deals that have seemingly limited impact on relevant markets. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Because of the Section 2 actions, Texas’ gamble didn’t pay off. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
One can gamble by making bets and rolling dice to win or lose DopeCoins; whether this is illegal or legal gambling is an open question depending on how you view betting with DopeCoins. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 1:23 pm
In situations where other types of relief are not available, you may be able to seek relief from your spouse’s tax debt with separation of liability relief. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 8:14 pm
It’s like, you know, Colin, even if you don’t really know, Colin, so you’re you’re writing constantly, you mentor students, and of course, you have your day job. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 7:06 am
They’re here to help use Austin as a signal to anyone who gets in their way in any other city. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:35 pm
They’re just in a second, separate term sheet. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green… [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 4:24 pm
You’re kidding me. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Thus, in In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 489 F. [read post]
