Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1841 - 1860
of 13,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 5:01 pm
We're back to a White House-penned bill now, S.1927. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 11:05 am
Also, a judge is not able to continue judgment (i.e. grant a PJC) on some charges. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:31 am
One point made was that when someone else owns your name (i.e., @JohnSmith), what are you supposed to do? [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:28 am
"I have decided, today, that I will no longer simply include the word "nonrefundable" in my retainer agreements with a detailed explanation of the word "nonrefundable and how it affects the retainer agreement, i.e. you're not getting your money back if you choose to hire another lawyer, have a dispute with this lawyer, or otherwise wish to cancel the agreement.What I am going to do from now on is provide the client with a separate document solely discussing… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:29 pm
Consider the firm's assets to ensure that you're sufficiently protected. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:09 pm
“An almost universal objective of re-examining partner compensation systems is to increase cross-firm collaboration. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
See In re White, 73 USPQ2d 1713 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 4:56 am
In re Vanity Fair, Inc., Serial No. 78515219 (December 17, 2007) [not precedential].A proper Section 2(e)(3) requires proof of three elements: (1) the primary significance of the mark is a generally known geographic location; (2) the consuming public is likely to believe that the goods originate in that location (i.e., a goods-place association exists), when in fact the goods do not, and (3) the misrepresentation would be material to the consumer's decision to purchase the… [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:36 pm
You’re probably getting excited about watching Super Bowl LI being played over in Houston. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:32 am
In re McNeil (08-1546). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:37 pm
See In re DeLaet, Case #13-04032. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
Res. 111 disapproving the arbitration rule under the CRA. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
" The Board swiftly found the primary significance of the mark to be a place generally known to the public: i.e., France, or even the National Forests of France. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 3:36 am
Additionally, while proponents are not required to consider new noise receptors when re-issuing draft site plans for the purposes of the setback prohibitions (i.e. minimum 550 m noise setback), they must still comply with the ministry’s noise guidelines/limits. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
By the way, on September 21 I’m doing a free phone seminar and you’re invited. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:50 pm
The less that you have to borrow, the sooner you can start living the good life (i.e. debt free) after law school. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm
In re Storey 6th Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:50 pm
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a settlement in a case involving allegations that an online bar code re-seller engaged in an “invitation to collude” under Section 5 of the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
In a decision ordered published on June 17, 2014, nearly a month after it was originally filed, the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed a key element of the related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel – the concept of “privity. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:00 pm
A personal injury is any harm (i.e. injury) to a person’s body, mind, or emotions. [read post]
