Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1841 - 1860
of 13,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
See In re White, 73 USPQ2d 1713 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
" The Board swiftly found the primary significance of the mark to be a place generally known to the public: i.e., France, or even the National Forests of France. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
By the way, on September 21 I’m doing a free phone seminar and you’re invited. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm
In re Storey 6th Cir. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:50 pm
The less that you have to borrow, the sooner you can start living the good life (i.e. debt free) after law school. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
In a decision ordered published on June 17, 2014, nearly a month after it was originally filed, the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed a key element of the related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel – the concept of “privity. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:50 pm
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a settlement in a case involving allegations that an online bar code re-seller engaged in an “invitation to collude” under Section 5 of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:00 pm
A personal injury is any harm (i.e. injury) to a person’s body, mind, or emotions. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:12 pm
Realize that if someone out there is reading your blog, that person may be reading other blogs within your industry (i.e. your competitors). [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
UNCOUPLE YOUR PRESENT VALUE FROM WHAT YOU MADE LAST YEAR your present compensation serves as a powerful anchor of your value to your employer's advantage the following suggestions are a way of re-anchoring that value so that your starting point is greater than what you made this year recalibrate your value according to what you are worth in your employer's hands, i.e., what does your employer save or make based upon the work you do (this may require research on… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Here are some recent stories that I found interesting: The Auditors And Financial Regulatory Reform: That Dog Don’t Hunt by Francine McKenna in re: The Auditors The firms are broken and their basic product is worthless. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:56 am
Needless to say, many pundits are now commenting on the rules of the Democratic Party re the selection of its presidential candidate. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:47 am
As discussed here and here, In re: Katherine K. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 10:10 am
Meanwhile, the grandma looks like she needs to re-read the manual. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:51 am
by Dennis Crouch In re ZTE (Fed. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:31 pm
See n re Tiffin, 448 F.2d 791, 792 (CCPA 1971); In re Hiniker, 150 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
,"Come on, you've got to let us at least challenge our inclusion on the list, including at least telling us whether we're in fact on it or not" -- as well as (most likely) substantive ones (i.e., "Remove us from the list. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
It's easy to say "I'm sorry" in the sorry-if-you-are-offended form, i.e., a nonapology. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 4:19 am
In re Motor Fuel, at 3. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
In re Apollo Group, Inc. [read post]
