Search for: "JONES v. JONES" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
 Limiting recovery for maintenance and cure to whatever is permitted by the Jones Act would give greater pre-emptive effect to the Act than is required by its text, Miles [v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Jordan Fowler, Washington Legal Foundation] To quote the opinion in Jones v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:08 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (29 March 2011) Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 (29 March 2011) Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Folgate London Market Ltd v Chaucer Insurance Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 328 (31 March 2011) W (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 345 (30 March 2011) Societe Generale, London Branch… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:57 am by The Editor , CMS
Robert Jones and Joseph Marsden, who work within the insurance and reinsurance group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down in the matter of Wells v Devani [2019] UKSC 4. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Recall that: "The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 4:34 am
She sued, alleging violations of the New York State and City Human Rights Law, but the First Department dismissed her complaint, in Jones v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:30 am by Howard Bashman
“Federal Judges or Their Brokers Traded Stocks of Litigants During Cases; Dozens of judges have reported share purchases and sales made while they presided in suits involving those companies, a WSJ investigation found”: Coulter Jones, Joe Palazzolo, and James V. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 9:31 am
We've had a couple of requests for a post about the Fifth Circuit argument on Monday in Ackermann v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
By a majority decision (5-2) the UK Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney [2011] UK SC 13, in a leapfrog appeal from a first instance decision, has held that there is no longer any justification for the immunity of expert witnesses from civil suit for breach of duty in relation to their involvement in litigation. [read post]