Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
The latter holds metadata for five years, thus suggesting the sort of sustained surveillance held unlawful by the court of appeals in Maynard and the Supreme Court in Jones. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association Inc. and Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm by Erin Miller
§ 1407 may seek to overturn an adverse forum non conveniens pretrial ruling by the transferee district court through mandamus to the circuit court with appellate authority over the transferor district court, rather than the circuit court with such authority over the transferee district court, after the cases are returned to the transferor district court for trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Rhode Island2012). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy late last month. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:38 pm
  In several other recent cases, the courts rejected government's arguments that it was not required to undertake great efforts to provide an owner actual notice:  In Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
  As to the latter, the judge found that `there is a record made on the computer that John Jones has sent Mary Smith a message on a particular day. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
The Court decided that one-time relist Shabo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am by Susan Landau
District Court for the District of Columbia barring the bulk collection, the government immediately appealed to the court of appeals for a stay, which was granted. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:34 am
Roe, 296 F.3d 770, 776 (9th Cir.2002) (remanding to the district court to determine whether a claim of actual innocence as defined under Schlup had been established before addressing "what consequences such a finding has with respect to AEDPA's one-year statue of limitation"); Wyzykowski v. [read post]