Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 1841 - 1860 of 82,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
"   Tobacco, 46 Cal.4th at 320 (citing Bank of the West v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Facilitator: Akanmu Adebayo, Ombuds, Kennesaw State University Mediation v. ombuds. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
  Nevertheless, there was a development in Cambridge University Press, et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am by Jessica Arons
Vermont and Rhode Island also acted to ensure that the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy will remain protected in their states, regardless of what the Supreme Court might do to Roe v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”*** Much the same argument would apply to retirees of the State as the employer who retired prior to the effective date of the President’s Regulation as such retirees are not employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law nor did they receive any benefit with respect to job security as, like judges, retirees cannot be “laid off. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:08 am by Randall Drew
Kentucky sets an important precedent (especially in states like NH that don't have a mandatory non-citizen warning statute or court rule like the other New England States) By ADAM LIPTAK Published: March 31, 2010 “It is our responsibility under the Constitution to ensure that no criminal defendant — whether a citizen [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:08 am by Randall Drew
Kentucky sets an important precedent (especially in states like NH that don't have a mandatory non-citizen warning statute or court rule like the other New England States)By ADAM LIPTAKPublished: March 31, 2010“It is our responsibility under the Constitution to ensure that no criminal defendant — whether a citizen or not [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]