Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1841 - 1860 of 20,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2022, 3:38 am by SHG
This was a matter of T and Q, with the possibility of the plus having some influence according to what the plus means. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 12:48 pm by Dan Bressler
The DOJ told the Washington Examiner that McQuaid was ‘screened and recused from matters in which he has a financial interest or a personal business relationship, including matters involving his former law firm.'” “‘Obviously, there is a potential conflict of interest, but it would depend on (a) how much — if any — involvement McQuaid had in L&W’s representation of Hunter, and (b) how much interaction U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 10:11 am by David Oxenford
  No matter what the holding of this case, a more fundamental question arises – what is a reversionary interest and why is it prohibited? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 7:29 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Urgent Business-Related Travel Matters Question: To help facilitate legitimate business travel for foreign national employees who require visa services abroad, are there other mechanisms for U.S. companies, aside from contacting post, to address urgent business-related travel matters? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Posted by Maia Gez, Era Anagnosti, Melinda Anderson, White & Case LLP, on Monday, November 21, 2022 Editor's Note: Maia Gez and Era Anagnosti are Partners and Melinda Anderson is Counsel at White & Case LLP. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Posted by Maia Gez, Era Anagnosti, Melinda Anderson, White & Case LLP, on Monday, November 21, 2022 Editor's Note: Maia Gez and Era Anagnosti are Partners and Melinda Anderson is Counsel at White & Case LLP. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:45 am by Eliana Baer
” Don’t get me wrong, a Toen is indispensable to most Bais Din proceedings. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:38 am by Giles Peaker
Lambeth’s argument that the requirements for reasoning set out in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [(2015) UKSC 22, (2015) PTSR 549 didn’t apply because that was about s.193 accommodation and s.202 review decisions was not accepted. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Bowie knives are back in constitutional law news these days, after a very long absence. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 5:53 am by Russell Knight
“[I]t [is] improper for the judge to consider the evidence heard at the ex parte hearing” In re Marriage of Gordon, 233 Ill. [read post]
Garland has insisted to date that the Justice Department can handle these matters with integrity through its regular processes. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:02 pm by John Ross
Politics aside, that's just very cool as a matter of physics. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 7:42 am by Alex Phipps
The matter reached trial on January 11, 2021, after delays related to COVID-19. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The case is In the Matter of D.K.; it was decided by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020, but I hadn't noticed it then, and just learned about it because of a new decision that cited it. [read post]
I don’t think there’s anything in the function, any sub-function that I haven’t touched. [read post]