Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 42,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2009, 7:48 pm
  It was not surprising, on appeal, that defendant argued that there was no evidence in the record - but to do so, he had to fail to comply with the rules and submit the trial evidence. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
External validity objections may well play a role in a contest under Rule 702, but the resolution of a doubling of risk issue will require an appropriate measure of risk for the plaintiff whose injury is at issue. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:56 am
’ Military Rule of Evidence [hereinafter Mil. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm by Juan Antunez
Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter for the trial court to clarify whether it considered all the relevant evidence, and if not, to reconsider its ruling on the basis of the evidence presented. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:29 am by ccladm
However, judges must decide matters of law, and they are required to permit the jury to hear all relevant evidence that is not prohibited by law. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:29 am by ccladm
However, judges must decide matters of law, and they are required to permit the jury to hear all relevant evidence that is not prohibited by law. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
On the motion for reconsideration, plaintiff proffered an entirely new argument that HFC’s nerve center was actually in Colorado and further argued that reconsideration was warranted under Federal Rule 60(b)(1)(excusable neglect), Rule 60(b)(2)(newly discovered evidence), Rule 60(b)(6)(any reason justifying relief) and Local Rules regarding new facts. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:38 am by Laura Springer Brown
On November 8, the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeals added to the relatively sparse body of appellate rulings in pipeline expropriation matters. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
The court stated: But in an appraisement * * * the strict rules relating to arbitration and awards do not apply, and the appraisers were not rigidly required to confine themselves either to matters within their own knowledge, or those submitted to them formally in the presence of the parties; but might reject, if they saw fit, evidence so submitted, and inform themselves from any other source, as experts who were at last to act upon their own judgment. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am by MOTP
After the parties and the trial court discussed Build by Owner's discovery-related motions, the trial court asked if there were any other matters to consider. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:41 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
COURT RULE 5:1-5 ARBITRATION The New Jersey Supreme Court enacted a new rule, Court Rule 5:1-5 which provides rules for the arbitration of divorce matters. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:44 pm by Beth Graham
As a result, the homeowners sought discovery pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm by Ronald Meisburg
 Specifically, the ALJ ruled in the following ways with respect to corporate policies that forbade employees from: Engaging in solicitation during work time, distributing nonbusiness literature in work areas at any time and using company resources (such as emails, computers, telephones and fax machines) for solicitation or distribution purposes The ALJ upheld this rule, finding that employees have no statutory right to use an employer’s equipment for personal… [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 12:04 pm by Adam Levitin
The study doesn't conform with basic norms of scholarship, such as discussing contrary evidence and having conclusions flow from evidence. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by Rita Handrich
Recent research (according to the current authors) has highlighted at least two potential issues with even this limited exception to the hearsay rule. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Chao Liu
” It then reserves the right to revisit any state law if evidence arises that a state policy is found to “interfere or [be] incompatible. [read post]