Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 1841 - 1860 of 120,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm by WIMS
In this rule, the EPA established Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and a Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC) for PM2.5, screening tools the EPA uses to determine whether a new source may be exempted from certain requirements under § 165 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 11 May 2018 Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Reid v Newsquest (Midlands South) Ltd. [read post]
In the recent decision of the IPEC in Stone v Wenman, the court reiterated and applied some key principles in the law of passing off. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 pm
Accordingly, we conclude that defendant is not entitled to resentencing with respect to his using-a-computer-to-commit-a-crime conviction.People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Supp. 740, 785, 836 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (“A government administrative agency may regulate or prohibit the use of toxic substances through rulemaking, despite a very low probability of any causal relationship. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:02 am by Sarah Posner
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Wednesday ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] in Sackett v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Holland v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
The Trustee argued this debtor lived alone and claimed an ownership expense for a 03 Toyota Tacoma and a 06 Yamaha 650 V-star motorcycle. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:10 am by Shriram T. Eachambadi
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-3 on Thursday in Torres v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:56 pm
Ventris - Whether prosecutors may use a defendant's statement - made in the absence of a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to counsel - to impeach a witness, as opposed to during its case-in-chief. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:12 am by HRWatchdog
In 1982, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Suastez v. [read post]