Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 1841 - 1860 of 3,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
In ordering Encompass to produce an unredacted claims diary and letters from counsel for the court's in camera inspection, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Arthur M. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am by Schachtman
  The author of the chapter on multiple regression goes on to note that most courts have shown a preference for two-tailed tests. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The Second Department explains in Potruch & Daab, LLC v Abraham   2012 NY Slip Op 05505 Decided on July 11, 2012   Appellate Division, Second Department : "The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the counterclaims to recover damages for, among other things, legal malpractice. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:38 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The Supreme Court in New York County, New York recently addressed this question in  Tripp & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U); Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115967/2010; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 11:58 am by BuckleySandler
On June 28, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department unanimously confirmed the New York Supreme Court’s dismissal of a mortgage-buyback lawsuit brought by investors against a bank, holding that the investors’ action was barred by the “no-action” clause in the Pooling and Servicing Agreements (PSAs). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by National Indian Law Library
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetitions for certiorari were filed in Miranda v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division for the First Department recently addressed this question. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of MEI's motion which was to dismiss the equitable affirmative defenses asserted [*3]by Hurst on the ground that they are unavailable in this action. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm by Jennifer Nejad
That decision has been appealed by defendants and a decision from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, is expected near the end of 2012. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
Surprisingly, even though the assets were exempt both before and after the transfer, the New Jersey Supreme Court found that Gilchinsky's motivation for the rollover was to conceal assets from her New York creditors, and as such it found fraudulent intent on her part. [read post]