Search for: "People v Goode"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 19,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2013, 4:36 am
Lozman argued that the house, which had no self-propulsion, energy production/storage, or rudder, was not a ‘vessel’ because it’s purpose and was not to transport goods or people. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Ryan and Trevino v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
” Otherwise, there would never be an occasion to test whether an old precedent remains good law.Where is the line between permissible test legislation and impermissible defiance of existing precedent for no other reason than harassment of people who want to exercise their rights? [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:33 am
Ahold Licensing SA v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:07 am
For instance, last year, a three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:13 am
The Facts of the Case In the recent case of Britton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:04 am
Public concerns have been running amuck on the internet regarding the recent tentative decision by the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 8:48 am
The lower court judge should feel good about his work. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
The State of New York Court of Appeals strictly limited “all persons-present” warrants in People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm
The first point to make is that it is difficult to engage in discussions with people who are not willing to provide their names. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:56 am
Bloomberg did a piece on Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:44 pm
It is good policy to allow people to create trusts imposing conditions on the use of the land when leaving it to a municipality. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
For the people shot. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court decided a case in 1990, Illinois v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
More good news for liberals! [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm
In the case of United States of America v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
The Judge held that the average consumer included people in the Jack Wills target group, namely younger people, but also included older people, including those who purchased clothes as gifts for younger people. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
– The California Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
