Search for: "People v. Commons"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 14,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2019, 1:58 pm
Owners of real property owe a duty of care to people invited onto their property under the legal theory of “premises liability,” a common-law doctrine derived from the theory of negligence (i.e., the absence of ordinary care). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 10:42 am
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:09 am
Do people even read user agreements? [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:37 am
In the case of East Longmeadow Management Systems v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
[People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
In People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
Illustration: "Thomas the Slav with his army assails Constantinople in spring, 822" via Wikimedia Commons. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
The UK Supreme Court has rejected arguments that it should expand its jurisprudence on passing-off to follow an alleged trend in other common law countries, in this morning's judgment in Starbucks (HK) Limited and another v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and others[2015] UKSC 31. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
In such cases, the US government knowingly and deliberately uses force to place people in harm's way. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:18 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The proper construction of section 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of section 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:37 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:34 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Milward v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm
See, People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:41 am
Venal & Grabbit, Solicitors:===PRESS RELEASE===London, 9th November 2011: Venal & Grabbit welcome the decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott today. [read post]
