Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2017, 2:33 pm
“Almost all scientists have stated (or have been tempted to state) something like ‘the mean of Group A was greater than that of Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant’. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:35 pm
The case was Turner v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 4:36 am
” Hong KongChor Ki Kwong David v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
In other words, for the most part my role as general counsel does not engender much strife; there generally is no one on another side of a “v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:31 am
As Judge Clifford Bellamy stated, the 'proverbial man on the Clapham omnibus' may be surprised to learn that a parent who has murdered the other parent should nonetheless be entitled to make an application for contact with his child, but there is of course no presumption in law that murder would be a bar to contact.On a lighter note, I was pleased to report on the 16th of March the marketing of my favourite memento of the forthcoming royal wedding, also known as… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm
The best example, though, is clearly Leduc v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:15 pm
Coalition politicians claim the bill, expected to get Royal Assent in early 2012, would restrict “state intrusion” in people’s lives and restore “civil liberties”. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
On September 17, 2010, a two-judge majority of the Second Circuit held in Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:05 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, decided on January 8. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 2:20 am
People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:21 am
(Interesting advance note on that upcoming report: the CIO of the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System is a Commission Member; SERS has been lead plaintiff in a number of securities actions, including against CIGNA Corp. and Royal Dutch/Shell Transport, as they then were.) [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 11:08 pm
Perhaps one of the most eagerly awaited by landlords will be the appeal to the Supreme Court of the case of Edwards v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:07 am
It cannot be simplified or clarified, not even when, like in Washington v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
“Best Interests of the Corporation” – more than solely shareholder interests Bill C-97 aims to consolidate the law on the fiduciary duty of directors and officers by codifying the Supreme Court’s findings in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders (BCE). [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:13 am
., et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
On September 17, 2010, a two-judge majority of the Second Circuit held in Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 2:20 am
People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
It will now go to the House of Commons for final consideration ahead of Royal Assent. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
Pant advised the State to stop taking criticism of governance as a personal insult. [read post]
