Search for: "Richard v. United States" Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 7:40 am by Steve Lubet
In the Sunday, June 23, New York Times, Kwame Anthony Appiah had an oped titled “Stonewall and the Myth of Self-Deliverance," in which he observed that “England basically decriminalized homosexuality in 1967, fully 36 years before it was decriminalized in the United States in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKLegal ProfessionGovernment's Disqualification Motion Denied; Factors Favored Waiver of Potential Conflicts United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kan Pacific Saipan) and a Seventh Circuit opinion of Judge Richard Posner (in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
The United States’s Doreen Bogdan-Martin will face Russia’s Rashid Ismailov in a vote that occurred Sept. 29. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
EPA (07-588) and Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:47 am by Amy Howe
United States, a case involving the constitutionality of orders freezing a criminal defendant’s assets in which the Court will hear oral arguments in the upcoming Term. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
There’s something for everyone: abortion restrictions, the Lanham Act, jurisdiction over foreign states, antidiscrimination law, ERISA, a surprisingly basic Armed Career Criminal Act question and even something called the “Bob Richards” rule. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 10:48 am by Dennis Crouch
  United States Patent Nos. 10,898,574, 10,702,600, and 10,933,127. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Of course, for federal private-prison inmates, suits against the United States directly are out. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]