Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2016, 8:45 am
In the case, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:45 am
In the case, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
” Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
” Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
” Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
” Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:30 am
After, what felt like a small eternity to this writer, the CJEU has released its judgment on the case yesterday.The case of GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV dealt with pictures of Britt Dekker (a famous Dutch TV personality), commissioned by Sanoma Media for publication in Playboy magazine. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:36 am
In the United States copyright similarly does not allow for the creation of translations of works, as under 17 USC section 106 the copyright holder has the sole right to create 'derivative works', which does include translations. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit joined several other circuits in holding contrary to statute a Department of Justice (DOJ) regulation divesting the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of jurisdiction when an alien leaves the United States in Lin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
See, e.g., the Lenz v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 2:39 pm
Limelight Networks, Inc. and McKesson Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Holder Kurns v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
The declaration for invalidity of the RCD was brought under Article 25 (1)(e) CDR, which stipulates that “a Community design may be declared invalid if a distinctive sign is used in a subsequent design, and Community law or the law of the Member State governing that sign confers on the right holder of the sign the right to prohibit such use”. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Judges Nathan and Netburn also disagreed with Escape's argument that pre-1972 sound recordings should be excluded, with Judge Nathan citing the recent decision in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:40 pm
Impression Products v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
It would be simpler for a patent holder to just use the U.S. patent to cover foreign activity. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:27 pm
Houston v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:11 am
In Lexicon, Inc. v. [read post]
