Search for: "State v. J. L. B."
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm
COLORADO) Douglas B. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
L. 105–277, div. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
A state cannot control its people on the basis of negatives (e.g., we are not the United States). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Use of FBS in Cognitive Malingering The use of the Fake Bad Scale to support cognitive malingering may violate the National Academy of Neuropsychology published methods for assessing symptom validity which states “Invalid performance on a measure of personality” (such as the MMPI in this case) “cannot be used, a priori, to determine malingering of cognitive tests. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
Use of FBS in Cognitive Malingering The use of the Fake Bad Scale to support cognitive malingering may violate the National Academy of Neuropsychology published methods for assessing symptom validity which states “Invalid performance on a measure of personality” (such as the MMPI in this case) “cannot be used, a priori, to determine malingering of cognitive tests. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:14 am
L. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Did John B. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
J. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
And unlike United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
Evid. 201(b). [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
” In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
Jonah B. [read post]
