Search for: "v. AT&T Mobility" Results 1841 - 1860 of 5,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Extended Version:The 2016 FTC v AT&T Mobility decision at the 9th Circuit eliminated the Federal Trade Commission’s authority to enforce privacy rules on ISPs in Arizona, Alaska, Hawaii, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
He called the HR manager several times in September and October 2013 to discuss returning, but she didn’t respond for weeks. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/rOc8oWFoPS -> 4th judgment for counterfeiting shows that court awards are too lenient Lam v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am by Schachtman
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434 (2006), and Cornell v. 360 W. 51st St. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Socially Aware blog has looked at the recent decision in the Hague regarding WhatsApp, and how this could create concerns for mobile app developers. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 9:57 pm by Patricia Salkin
New Cingular Wireless, doing business as AT&T Mobility (“AT&T”), applied for a permit from the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Planning Commission to build a 125-foot cell-phone tower. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:06 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
For example, we have the exponential rise in the use of cell phones and other mobile devices by drivers. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Alex van der Wolk and Ronan Tigner
The post The Hague District Court’s WhatsApp Decision Creates Concerns for Mobile App Developers appeared first on Socially Aware Blog. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
ABC News writes that ISIS launched a significant counterattack near the two of Tal Afar, near west Mosul, Sunday night, detonating 17 car bombs and targeting positions held by Shiite militia forces known as the Popular Mobilization Forces. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Still a lot of mobilization around user rights.What’s wrong with rights? [read post]