Search for: "Barns v. Barns" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 2:29 am by gmlevine
Lucas Barnes, D2009-1800 (WIPO February 5, 2010) alleging common law trademark in AIDS-DRUGS-ONLINE.COM. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root writes that in Kisor v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
Zimmer and Halo Electronics v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” At Legal Newsline, John Breslin covers Jarchow v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:40 pm by Jeff Nowak
It also is great protection against FMLA litigation, since a number of courts have upheld this approach in the past couple years alone: Barnes v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:35 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Oct. 22, 2020) Related posts: How Zappos’ User Agreement Failed In Court and Left Zappos Legally Naked (Forbes Cross-Post) Barnes & Noble’s Online Contract Formation Process Fails –Nguyen v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Justice Stephen G. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Rosalind English
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
Matthew Barnes of 1 Crown Office Row represented the secretary of state in this case. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in Benisek v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:01 am by Andrew Hamm
Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung of Reuters predict that the “possibility [Kavanaugh] could vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
”  Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, Tony Mauro at the BLT, and Jess Bravin of the WSJ Law Blog also have coverage. [read post]