Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 8,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Saxbe Designated Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University Tom Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Middle District of North Carolina (Attorney for [sic] Vincent Rita, Rita v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:28 pm by Peter Margulies
For example, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
It's that time again... time to check in on the week's news in Suits by Suits: The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its opinion in Velazquez-Perez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:38 pm by David S. Jones
This is in response to a March 21 district court decision, in Comité de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:55 pm
A line of cases beginning with DeCanas v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
This essay explores these issues through the lens of one of the most important international law cases in the United States in at least the last decade: Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena v. von Saher 14-545Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit, in holding that this action should proceed, properly second-guessed and rejected the executive branch's U.S. foreign policy determinations. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
Some of the same issues were mooted in an older Irish case — Moore v. [read post]