Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
United States, 51 F.4th 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 2022))). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
He was the first officer on the scene at approximately 1:11 a.m. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
This also means that it does not define a multiplicity of varieties which necessarily consists of s [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:20 pm
The distance does not make any difference in the views that follow, and so I have left the description as being from the viewpoint of the skies over Babylon.] [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
However, only one state, New Jersey, interpreted the existing Indian family exception as a distortion of ICWA and declined to adopt the exception.[1] Indiana adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in the 1988 case of In the Matter of Adoption of T.R.M.[2] The child, T.R.M., was born in Hot Springs, South Dakota to a mother who was a member of the Oglala Sioux Indian Tribe.[3] The paternity of the child was not established.[4] … [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
That these are determinative factors for the purposes of Articles 4(1) and 4(2) does not exclude them from consideration under 4(3). [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 12:54 pm
Have a score of 51 or higher on the Armed Forces Qualification Test. 3.2.5. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
” (This prohibition is also discussed in 51(2) and 52(2) whereas 51(3) renders civilians targetable “for such time as they directly participate in hostilities. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Background This dispute arises out of Enviro-Grow Nursery, a business in which Rueda owned a 49% interest and Holland owned a 51% interest. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am
He stated that the first message's property file listed the `modified’ time as July 15, 2009 at 12:51:58 p.m.; the second message's `modified’ date was July 15 at 12:52:24 p.m.; the third message had a `modified’ time of July 17 at 1:29:12 p.m.; and the fourth message had a `modified’ time of July 17 at 2:10:38 p.m. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
§51-1-11.1(b); Idaho Code §6-1407; Ill. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
"Beasts in human shape"---sounds pretty exclusory, does it not? [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:12 am
The traditional view, based on Art. 51 of AP-I, is that members of an armed group engaging in an armed conflict are in fact civilians, and are thus protected, “unless and for such time as they take direct part in hostilities. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
Even if ideology (or pragmatism) sometimes does not seem to matter, it still continues to linger in the background both shaping and guiding thinking. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:16 am
By Sophia Williams Launched in 2020, Warfare of Art & Law, a podcast hosted by attorney and artist Stephanie Drawdy, is a trove of conversations exploring how “justice does or doesn’t play out when art and law overlap. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:17 pm
” Id. at 51. [read post]
