Search for: "Frank v. United States"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade, taking on Griswold v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In the 1770s, the colonies of what would later be known as the United States of America sought their freedom from England. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
However, in my respectful opinion, full and frank disclosure of the loan obligation being assumed by the condominium corporation (and its financial impact on the condominium's bottom line budget, and each unit owner's monthly common expense payments) is the panacea for curing all perceived ills and potential abuses. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Issuers Targeted in Securities Class Action Lawsuits Filed in the United States Posted by David H. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
As of August 31, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including six Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, three judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and one judge for the United States District Courts. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:03 am
On December 8, 2023, all but two members of the UN Security Council voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, with 13 of 15 States voting in favor and one abstaining, but they were prevented from taking that decisive action by the lone veto of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Dodd-Frank Protocols. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
United States (1935), the Supreme Court held that President Franklin Roosevelt couldn’t lawfully remove a commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission for solely political reasons. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
Less than a week after Hodak filed his dissolution petition, Golan Floors, Ruham, and Hodak were all sued in New York County by Farhadi, a dissatisfied customer who alleged that Golan Floors damaged his furniture and performed seriously substandard work in connection with the restoration of his Chelsea condominium unit (Farhadi v Golan Floors Inc., et al., No. 655203/2019). [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am
Haack at 6 (citing Tehan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
United States, companies have endured strict liability for the criminal acts of employees who were acting within the scope of their employment and who were motivated in part by an intent to benefit the corporation. [read post]
