Search for: "Grant v. United States of America" Results 1861 - 1880 of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To avoid defending an action, the insurer bears the burden of showing that the claim is not even potentially covered (see United States Fid. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Secretary United States Department Of Health & Human Services Case Background In Oxenberg, the plaintiffs submitted Medicare claims for therapy offered by Novocure, Inc. that were denied. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:39 am
  Extraditions from Mexico to the United States routinely limit prosecutions to not seeking death sentences in capital cases; a condition routinely granted by American prosecutors in exchange for the extradition. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
Precisely because they are seen as straightforward, these provisions tend to be taken for granted. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:03 am by luiza
CoreCivic, the case would have instead been United States of America ex rel Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted a statewide preliminary injunction blocking a key section of the executive order restricting entry into the United States from seven majority-Muslim countries. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1341 Title: United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
Fourth, Moulin clarified the CNIL’s point of view with respect to the extraterritorial effect of de-listings, specifically its view that de-listings, when granted, should be granted on all global and local versions of a search engine service. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:38 am by Law Lady
  Criminal law -- Aliens -- Reentry into United States after removal or deportation -- Government is collaterally estopped from litigating alienage where jury's verdict of acquittal in prior federal criminal trial for illegal reentry was necessarily based on jury's reasonable doubt about defendant's alienage and fact of alienage status is an essential element of current prosecution for illegal reentry -- Because government is collaterally estopped from arguing… [read post]