Search for: "In re B. G."
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,679
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
(2) Is the adoption of an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative under Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a), a “ministerial project” exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080, subdivision (b)(1)? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:35 am
Widett (In re Health Gourmet, Inc.), 29 B.R. 673, 677 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Yet there is a split in the circuits on that point, and the Supreme Court will consider the issue in B&B v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 12:20 am
Cette suspension d’obligations est généralement considérée comme la sanction du droit de l’OMC. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
We’re down to four pretty big cases for decision. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:12 am
The next week, when he asked if he could use the bathroom during tent sales, the manager responded “you’re always on break buddy … you just wait for customers all day”. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:10 am
We’re getting there. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
" In re The Proctor & Gamble Co. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Il lui a plutôt offert de devenir une employée à temps partiel et de ne travailler que 34 heures par semaine tout en lui refusant certains avantages dont bénéficient les employés à temps plein. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
[…] [I]n applying the §101 exception, we must distinguish between patents that claim the “‘buildin[g] block[s]’” of human ingenuity and those that integrate the building blocks into something more, Mayo, 566 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
unlawfully copied works from the Internet or other sources;g. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
We shall see... stay tuned.Just something to think about.Read Article—By Phyllis G. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
Sample statements: an email recapping a MOJO redesign meeting stated that “[e]veryone also agreed that Kind is a best in class packaging that we should learn from for MOJO,” with a “[l]arge product visual with clear window”; “[g]ood branding (KIND)” (although that wasn’t part of the trade dress at issue here); “[c]laims on front panel (not wrapped); and “[g]ood flavor communication claim. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Chaque semaine, nous vous présentons un résumé d’une décision d’un tribunal québécois qui nous est fourni par la Société québécoise d’information juridique (SOQUIJ) et ayant un intérêt pancanadien. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
See Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(g). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
See Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(g). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
In 1991, Peter Huber, discussing traumatic cancer claims, wrote: “After years of floundering in the junk science morass of traumatic cancer, judges slowly abandoned sequence-of-events logic, turned away from the sympathetic speculations of family doctors, and struggled on to the higher and firmer ground of epidemiology and medical science. [read post]
