Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
PanzaDavid C. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:34 pm
b) If they weren’t, should India have banned endosulfan, invoking the precautionary principle? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:22 pm
Outgoing acting Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Steve Miller (R) and Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, J. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
ALI § 72, comment c. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
Ga. 2012)(J. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Arkansas where (a) the prosecution advises a trial court that the appointment of a particular lawyer in a capital case to represent multiple defendants may create a conflict of interest; (b) the appointed lawyer informs the court that he is financially unable to appoint capitally certified counsel for each of the co-defendants; (c) the court acknowledges these conflicts of interest, but delegates resolution of them to the same lawyer; (d) the conflicted attorney then advocates in a… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm
THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13] The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14] An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13] The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14] An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that the… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
Rule 35(b). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:30 pm
Posted by Henry (Hank) J. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Dormant and unmonopolisable therapies: what’s the matter? [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 5:49 pm
Both parties waived a hearing on the matter. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:00 am
“Valour Rather Than Prudence”: Hard Times And Hard Choices For Canada’s Legal Academy Harry Arthurs (2013) 76 (1) Saskatchewan Law Review Excerpt: Part C, The Return of Legal Fundamentalism [Footnotes converted to endnotes and renumbered.] [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:03 pm
(j) Eliminates Association’s liability for assessments on any parcel during the period Association holds title to such parcel. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
The opinion is In re Usher, __ N.E.2d __, 2013 WL 2145636 (Indiana Supreme Court 2013), and it involves conduct by Arthur J. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am
See BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(1)(b), (c), and (h). [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:38 am
(c) [was present and pretending to aid or assist in the commission of the offense.] [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:23 pm
In Microsoft's understanding, supported by a transcript, the court actually put all discovery unrelated to FRAND rate-setting on hold last spring.Exhibit B and C contain disclosures of witnesses by Microsoft.Exhibit D is an excerpt from a transcript of a March 14 conference call.Exhibits E-H are documents from the parties' correspondence regarding discovery requests and depositions. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
§ 741.30(6)(b). [read post]
