Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 1861 - 1880 of 42,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
After the evidence has been submitted, a party can file a motion for summary judgment to have the court rule on the issues in the case. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Dismissal of a Medical Malpractice Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction The court explained that it had the authority to dismiss a complaint if it determined that the action is frivolous, or if the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the matter. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Stephane Dupont
  Under HB 13-1249, if the lender fails to meet the requirements above, the debtor will be able to request payment of his/her attorneys’ fees incurred and the lender will have to wait at least an additional six months to re-file its Rule 120 action but only if it has “significant new or different evidence in support of the new motion”. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by Leland E. Beck
NRDC, if the statute is clear, that is the end of the matter for both the agency and the court. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:18 am
Parts 1 to 6 'provide for fundamental matters of general application and various preliminary matters', including the overriding objective (Part 1), application and interpretation (Part 2), forms (Part 5) and service (Part 6).5. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:50 am by Mary Beth Boyce
In order to pass the court’s test for admissibility, the plaintiff or the injured party must show that the evidence is relevant under Rule 402 of the Minnesota Rules of Evidence. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:20 am by John Wester
Recognizing that the record for each case is distinctive, the trial court ruling in Wal-Mart stood on a significant volume of evidence—statistical and anecdotal—pointing to gender discrimination. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:20 am by John Wester
Recognizing that the record for each case is distinctive, the trial court ruling in Wal-Mart stood on a significant volume of evidence—statistical and anecdotal—pointing to gender discrimination. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:57 pm
The rules of evidence with respect to hearsay shall apply unless waived by the parties. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:17 am by Annette Burns
Gama has been cited repeatedly, and often incorrectly, for the proposition that a trial court cannot exclude evidence that would tend to add information about a child’s best interests, no matter how late that evidence is produced or whether it violates disclosure requirements. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:54 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed the lower court’s ruling “on the law” and annulled the Commissioner’s decision, remitting the matter to the Police Board of Trustees for recomputation of the appropriate level of benefits to be awarded to Ginther. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
Bollinger, that a public college and/or university had the right to consider such matters of racial diversity when establishing its own admission standards. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:06 am by SHG
So cross produces better evidence, but even better evidence won’t overcome the inherent bias at colleges to convict, to ignore the evidence no matter how strongly it proves innocence? [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Scope of Cross-Examination Not UnlimitedPennsylvania Rule of Evidence 607(b) provides the general rule that "the credibility of a witness may be impeached by any evidence relevant to that issue, except as otherwise provided by statute or these rules. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
But there are only a handful of cases which discuss TAVIS in the context of s. 24(2) exclusion of evidence. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:14 am by Seth Borden
If Governor Romney wins the White House, it is almost certain the Board he appoints would rescind this rule; and, if President Obama is re-elected, this matter will continue to wind through the courts for final determination. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Under the proposed rule, two or more employers are joint employers if they “share or codetermine those matters governing employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]