Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 1861 - 1880
of 21,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 8:57 pm
The case cite is MBL/Toni&Guy Products, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am
For a useful 2012 analysis of Swedish extradition law and process, see Stockholm University’s Mark Klamberg here.) [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
Bennett has argued and briefed scores of cases before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Hawaii Supreme Court, and has twice successfully argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Chooseco LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:15 am
Carson Optical, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Mark v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
Regents of New Mexico State University (10th Cir., August 6, 2015) (affirming various judgments against plaintiffs for lack of proper briefing)*Martin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
The owner stated, “It wastes time to fight back. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
Scott Stawski v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:54 am
The case is entitled Thompson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Levanoff, et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Correction officer trainee dismissed after failing to keep his beard trimmedVales v State of New Jersey, CA3, No. 07-2971, opinion filed August 12, 2008 [marked "Not Precedential" and not published]Juan Valdes, a former corrections officer trainee, was discharged from the New Jersey Department of Corrections Officer Training Program for failing to keep his beard within a one-eighth inch allowance granted to him by the Academy as an accommodation of his religious… [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM… [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT Mark S. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
The federal anti-dilution law mandates that a mark must be so widely known to everyone across the United States as to be in the category of “famous” marks. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Licensing Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:17 am
The new implied discretion could not apply to non-UK citizens, nor foreign states. [read post]
