Search for: "Moore, Appeal of"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2013, 7:57 pm
Procedural HistoryLutz Biedermann and Jurgen Harms (collectively “Biedermann”) appeal a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”), now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, affirming the rejection of claims 32, 33, 35–37 37, 39, and 48 of U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
As Minister Moore said on September 22, 2010 when he was Heritage Minister:This idea of imposing a new tax on iPods and MP3 players is not a new idea because there are very few new ideas, unfortunately, that come from the opposition on the issues of copyright and taxes. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
Identifying the particular importance of incentives for newsgatherers, this Essay extends the Harper & Row rationale beyond its copyright mooring. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:54 pm
Today's guest post is from Brody Ockander of Rehm Bennett Moore of the Nebraska Bar a regular contributor to this blog. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
Neighbors also appealed the Town’s failure to seek enforcement against Landowners for various alleged zoning violations.The trial court upheld the Town’s position, and the Neighbors appealed to the SCOV.On appeal, the sole issue is about agriculture. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
The judges, from audience left to right: Stranch, Kethledge, McKeague, Sutton, Gibbons, Clay, Moore, Merritt, Batchelder, Boggs, Gilman, Rogers, Cook, Griffin, White, Donald. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:52 pm
(Intellect) appeals from the district court’s judgment that U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:13 pm
As was previously reported on this blog, Plaintiffs sought an answer to the question: “Should a court of appeals review a judge’s denial of a motion to recuse de novo or for an abuse of discretion? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:13 am
As was previously reported on this blog, Plaintiffs sought an answer to the question: “Should a court of appeals review a judge’s denial of a motion to recuse de novo or for an abuse of discretion? [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:21 pm
Martens.Date of Decision: October 2, 2013Facts: A Natrona County jury found John Allen Moore guilty of a single count of felony larceny, and Moore perfected a timely appeal from the district court’s judgment and sentence.Issues: Moore raises three issues which we restate as follows: 1. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
[…] TecSec appealed, challenging the district court’s claim construction as well as its conclusion that TecSec failed to prove infringement by IBM. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 6:03 am
Today’s post comes from guest author Roger Moore, from Rehm, Bennett & Moore. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 6:03 am
Today’s post comes from guest author Roger Moore, from Rehm, Bennett & Moore. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:50 pm
Legal Reasoning (Moore, Linn, O'Malley)A. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
The Court of Appeal dismissed their claims in July. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Moore 13-103Issue: Whether law-enforcement agents accused of retaliatory prosecution in violation of the First Amendment should receive qualified immunity where the officers could reasonably have believed that the prosecution was supported by probable cause. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal considered the enforceability of the Solicitor’s Agreement. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
The court rejects the defendant's contention that, since he did not waive his right to appeal, the Brady claim is subject to review akin to People v Mack and People v Land. [read post]
