Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2023, 6:44 pm
In February 2023, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed a new law that would give temporary workers in the state more protections.BENEFITS UNDER THE NEW LAWThe law, known as the Temporary Workers' Bill of Rights, N.J.S.A. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 2:13 pm
Genesco Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:00 am
”2 The failure to file a timely oath cannot be cured by subsequently filing the required oath, Informal Opinion of the Attorney General, 86-41.3 "Where ... the individual was present at the board meeting at which he was appointed and thus had actual notice of his appointment, written notice thereof was not required to commence the 30-day period," McDonough v Murphy, 92 AD2d 1022, affirmed 59 NY2d 941.4 Judicial notice is the recognition by a judicial body or an… [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
Supreme Court — including Korematsu v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:43 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Just Say No To Overtime — via Next Blog How Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Murphy, 126 S.W. 343, 345 (Tex. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:53 pm
Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:41 am
Not only is that case roundly criticized in the academic community, but the part of the opinion on which Justice Richman relies was in any event only joined by Justices Jackson, Black and Burton, and the only way the "majority" became the majority was due to the concurrence of Justices Rutledge and Murphy, who submitted in their concurrence a relentless attack on the part of the opinion relied upon by Justice Richman.In short, I might have left the Supreme Court's 3-2-2-2… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:45 am
In a recent unpublished opinion, Grand Cru LLC d/b/a Restaurant Nicholas v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 2:46 pm
Boal v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
” In the Penn Program on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Eric Fikry explains why last term’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:54 pm
The plaintiffs in DeRiggi v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:45 am
In a recent unpublished opinion, Grand Cru LLC d/b/a Restaurant Nicholas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Like the final season of ABC’s hit series Lost, the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Like the final season of ABC’s hit series Lost, the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Like the final season of ABC’s hit series Lost, the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. [read post]
