Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2017, 2:27 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
King once was pastor, and to think about Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:34 pm
We argued that under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm
They could still identify Sisvel v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Inco, Justice Henderson of the Ontario Superior Court again chose retroactive liability, sweeping aside any meaningful limitation period for historic contamination. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm
It is noteworthy that the Court in R.E.Q. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
I was intrigued by the recent SC decision in Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya and Ors. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:12 am
Stas in 2012 appears to have adopted a three-part test defined by the Superior Court, Appellate Division in 1988’s State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
On 25 February 2017, the Novia Scotia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the award of damages in the case of Marson v Nova Scotia, 2017 NSCA 17 Denmark A Danish appeals court has upheld a defamation ruling and a 10,000-krone fine given to the Danish People’s Party, a populist party which supports the centre-right government. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:28 am
See Jurcoane v Superior Court (2001) 93 CA4th 886, 113 CR2d 483. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
The court didn’t buy it. #2 — Hughes v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division issued an important ruling recently in State v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 pm
G.M., the only other Canadian law blog I could find a citation to was a Slaw post by David Cheifetz in an Ontario Superior Court decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
Alleged Hedingham Shooter’s Case Headed to Superior Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
In last week’s Fisher v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
These peoples brought their culture and traditions, their problems and disputes as well as their means of settling disputes. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(E.g., People v. [read post]
