Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 178,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
Here’s more from the opinion: [Plaintiff] argues that [her boss] created a hostile environment when she overheard him say at the probation facility to “Do it to her when she gets out the door. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
Here’s more from the opinion: [Plaintiff] argues that [her boss] created a hostile environment when she overheard him say at the probation facility to “Do it to her when she gets out the door. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 11:08 am
Have plaintiffs waived their objection to the district court’s order admitting the evidence? [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:37 am
In the underlying action, the Supreme Court determined that the facts and circumstances giving rise to the plaintiff's accident were insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a claim under the Labor Law §§ 240(1) or 241(6). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
One time, the plaintiff’s supervisor made an inappropriate sexual comment to the plaintiff about her. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
We’ve ranted recently about plaintiff expert witnesses who believe they are the world’s foremost authority on everything. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:03 am
The post District Court Grants Attorney’s Fees Where Plaintiff Pursued Plainly Invalid Patents appeared first on Patent Lawyer Blog. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:00 pm
Related StoriesApple Wins Another $119.6 Million from Samsung, But It’s Only 6% of What They Requested – eDiscovery Case LawAnother Instance Where Word is Not So Smart - eDiscovery Best PracticesDefendant Failure to Produce in Agreed Upon Format Leads to Dispute with Plaintiffs - eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
Plaintiff’s son, however, had not heard the directions to move back and was five feet closer to Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:08 am
Here, although defendant argued plaintiff’s claim implicated Florida’s medical malpractice standard of care (i.e., staff training and supervision), the act that caused plaintiff’s injury was not a direct result of the hospital’s administration of medical care or services that required professional judgment or skill. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
In summary, the plaintiffs argue that New Jersey's voting machines (Sequoia AVC Advantage) can't be trusted to count the votes, because they're so easily hacked to make them cheat. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm
To the extent that Plaintiff’s claims were ripe, Defendants argued that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the 90-Day Statute of Limitations under Section 65009(c)(1). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:02 pm
The court stated that primary assumption of risk barred the plaintiff’s claims for negligence. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:18 am
In its analysis, the Court noted that while several of these factors afforded no differentiation between either side, Haverhill’s amended pleadings were marginally better than the pleadings submitted by Lindell, and that Haverhill’s argument with respect to Catalyst’s failure to disclose was more developed than the similar argument which was presented by Lindell. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:18 pm
The district court found such information relevant, emphasizing the importance of understanding the precise financial stake held by the plaintiff’s members in the outcome of the lawsuit. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:37 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Plaintiff's son, S.F.B., was granted a religious exemption. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
Despite settling the third party claim for substantially less than the tortfeasor's liability limits, the Plaintiff nevertheless commenced a UIM claim against the Plaintiff's own automobile insurance carrier. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
The emails at issue were between plaintiff Lynch and two in-house Company attorneys who also provided legal advice to him on personal matters, distinct from advice they provided him in his capacity as the Company’s manager. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:24 pm
In performing the surgery, the defendant removed most of the plaintiff’s appendix, but left the “stump” in place. [read post]
