Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 9:52 am
Taylor Jr. of Horvitz Levy LLP, the CalChamber joined the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am
S. ___ (2015) (per curiam); Taylor v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505 [2004]; see also Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Serv [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505 [2004]; see also Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Serv [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
** * The decision notes that City "presented ample evidence that it passed the 2010 Ordinance only after pursuing a range of measures to increase revenue and cut expenses" and although New York law permitted the City to require the appellants to contribute up to 50 percent of the premium amount, the 2010 Ordinance required the Retirees to contribute substantially less.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
Claire Methven O'Brien and I are delighted to announce that Human Rights Due Diligence Laws: From Due Diligence Standards to New Legal Norms will be published by Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) in their Globalization: Law and Policy Series. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Some state statutes limited the coverage for workers’ compensation to diseases that manifested within a certain time window during and after employment. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:09 am
The second case, Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
In addition to the Illinois patients, there are patients in other states, but the Illinois officials did not report what states are involved. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
