Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 1861 - 1880 of 10,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
  A similar result was reached by the California Court of Appeals in 2005 in Anderson, McPharlin & Connors v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
Township of Scott and Justice Stephen Breyer’s in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
” The firm’s stellar reputation also attracted Gary Ingle – a retired Kern County Superior Court judge and attorney at the firm from the late 1970s to early 1980s. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm by Jeff Welty
Must search warrant applications that include connected cloud services be issued by a superior court judge? [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Not long after, in early 2018, Google was hit with another gender discrimination suit in California Superior Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 11:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
This distinction was recognized by a California Superior Court decision involving a class action lawsuit against Yelp for allegedly recording conversations without consent. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  [The problem that other courts would find is that the nature of the superiority is still completely undefined.](3) was a statement about the ex-CEO’s own obligations, and it didn’t disparage Deerpoint or indeed say anything about Deerpoint. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 13 conference)   Superior Communications Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:32 pm by Dan Bressler
” “California lawyer suspended for 30 days for failure to disclose client’s death while continuing to litigate matter” — “According to the stipulated facts, ‘Respondent learned of Alfeo Mattei’s death in or about June 2016 after the Court of Appeal remanded the case but failed to inform the court or opposing counsel, as required by Sonoma County Superior Court Local Rule 4.1(A). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1973) 9 Cal.3d 626, 640), but held that even if it could be considered, the Court would still reject it:  “The trial court was not obliged to read between the lines of [CBD]’s request for judicial notice to divine an unasserted theory of relevance, and we cannot say the court abused its discretion for failing to do so. [read post]