Search for: "True v. United States" Results 1861 - 1880 of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  As noted above, I think the opposite is true—that the government’s reading is compelled. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:19 am
United States, 566 U.S. ___ (2009). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by SHG
United States was unanimous, though it didn’t get there through the ordinary route of agreement. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
The president is not an “officer of the United States” as that term is used in the Constitution....2. ... [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 447 U.S. 649, 656–657, 100 S.Ct. 2395, 2401–2402, 65 L.Ed.2d 410; United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Shubha Ghosh and Erika Ellyne This post compares and contrasts the United States approach to patentable subject after last term’s Alice v CLS decision, with that in the European Union. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:17 pm
Osborne, on which the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(Cordis) and Wyeth (collectively, Appellants) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Dela- ware granting summary judgment that certain claims of U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 9:31 am by Melissa E. Scott
On March 17, 2021, in a matter of first impression, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held a party appealing a decision of the United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) may seek review of the decision in either the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or a district court—even if the party had previously appealed an earlier TTAB decision in the same case to the Federal… [read post]