Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 1861 - 1880 of 29,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2025, 10:52 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., Jan 31, 2025), the Court held that the SAFE Child Act revived suits against those who enabled the abuse, as well as against the abusers. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Second Circuit Court of Appeals to again consider if discrimination based on sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VIIZarda v Altitude Express dba Skydive Long Island, USCA, Docket No. 15-3775In Simonton v Runyon, 232 F.3d 33,* the Second Circuit said that "[w]hen interpreting a statute, the role of a court is limited to discerning and adhering to legislative meaning. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:45 am by Steve Vladeck
Given how the November 4 oral argument unfolded, the Supreme Court’s seven-to-two decision on Wednesday to side with a former air marshal-turned-whistleblower in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a unanimous Court in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am by David Gans
On Monday, Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amici curiae brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by Adam Feldman
The case cited far and away the most times in the lower court is U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal Decision Unsurprisingly the Court of the Appeal upheld the substantive decision of Mr Justice Eady. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:37 am by Aidan Wills
Frost v MGN originates from the well-known judgment (widely known as Gulati) of Mann J in the phone hacking litigation against the Mirror. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:45 pm
 I am of the belief that a majority of the justices on the Supreme Court -- perhaps even all of them -- are not as similarly concerned as Judges Noonan and Reinhardt about fairness. [read post]
Hearing the case in question, Satish Ragde v State of Maharashtra, on appeal last week, Justice Pushpa Ganediwala, sitting on the Nagpur Bench of the High court, held that there must be “skin to skin contact with sexual intent” for an act to be considered sexual assault under Section 7 of POSCO. [read post]