Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 4,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Otherwise, the product is “misbranded” under section 403(c) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 344-45 (1975) (quoting C. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. ref'd) (citing Limon v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Carranza v Nordstrom Inc., 2014 WL 10537816 (C. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:16 pm
The legislation is also notable in that it reverses a prohibition on judicial blue penciling that was established by the Nevada Supreme Court in a 2016 decision, Golden Road Motor Inn, Inc. d/b/a Atlantis Casino Resort v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:16 pm
The legislation is also notable in that it reverses a prohibition on judicial blue penciling that was established by the Nevada Supreme Court in a 2016 decision, Golden Road Motor Inn, Inc. d/b/a Atlantis Casino Resort v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
Supp. 2d 592 (D. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
(Phoenix Concert Theatre), 2012 ONCA 496 which set out the following factors to be considered in the test for reasonableness: (a) the time expended by the solicitor; (b) the legal complexity of the matter at issue; (c) the results achieved; and (d) the risk assumed by the solicitor. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am
The Examining Division found that claim 1 of the Main request was not new in view of prior art document D1, an Australian patent application by the appellant.Regarding feature d) of claim 1, the examining division stated that this feature was implicitly disclosed in D1 because every pharmaceutical to be dispensed had to have a predetermined position so that the desired pharmaceutical could be remotely dispensed, otherwise D1 would not operate. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am
” In a podcast at Constituting America, Steven Aden looks back at Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:06 am
C.A.), at paras. 24-27; and Professor John D. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm
C. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:53 am
By Lorene D. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
As an April post here noted, some people have been trying to get Google to deindex mainstream news articles — hide them from searchers by removing them from Google indexes — by (a) suing the people quoted in the articles, (b) getting stipulations from the people recanting their allegations, (c) getting court orders based on those recantations, and then (d) submitting those orders to Google. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm
Cir. 2010) (en banc), aff’d and remanded,132 S. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
” Document 2: Memorandum Opinion and Order, Judge Bates This memorandum opinion and order from Judge John D. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
š v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Bivens v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Secondly, they would face a number of practical difficulties in running their case: (a) they may not be able to obtain legal representation; (b) even if they could it would be more difficult to give adequate instructions; (c) they might not be able to give oral evidence at the hearing; and (d) they might not be able to obtain professional evidence from their probation officer and/or a consultant forensic psychiatrist about their risk of re-offending. [read post]
