Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 28,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The traditional reason (ie. expanding a claim term so that it covers an infringer) does not seem to be a factor. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
Jul 2: BP reported that for the last 12 hours on July 1 (noon to midnight), approximately 9,515 barrels of oil were collected and approximately 4,150 barrels of oil and 28.6 million cubic feet of natural gas were flared. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:01 am
However, does not raise any challenges to either Sections 11 and 12 or Rule 3. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm
Specifically,§ 325(e)(1) does not refer to “institution” decisions and infact is not limited to institution decisions. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 5:44 pm
Looking over the patent here, it does seem like that's [what Genicap did]. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:47 am
All the components are mixed in powder form, and finally two lipids, namely 1 wt% of magnesium stearate and 1 wt% of stearic acid, are added to the blender. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 7:20 am
"[W]e find that Claimant 1 complied with the form and manner requirements of the Rules per the language of Rule 165.3(a), which does not require a whistleblower to submit information on a Form TCR in his/her initial submission," the report stated.Award. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:14 pm
” Id. at 110-12. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
See, e.g., In re Rinard, 451 B.R. 12, 19–20 (Bankr. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
Seven under Section 4(1)(a) relating to national security, three under Section 4(1)(b) relating to courts, two under Section 4(1)(c) relating to Parliament and State Legislatures, three under Section 4(1)(d) relating to trade secrets and intellectual property rights, one each under Sections 4(1)(e) and (f) relating to fiduciary relationships and foreign relations, six under Section 4(1)(g) relating to law enforcement, three under Section… [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:42 am
In construing the claim, the Board found that the Applicant had read too narrowly: [C]laim 1 does not require that the executing at least one corrective action be performed by any particular unit, but merely recites executing at least one corrective action from the array of corrective actions (see claim 1). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:58 am
The main provision underlying this motion for clarification is Iowa Code § 6A.21(1)(c), which states: "Public use" does not include the authority to condemn agricultural land for private development purposes unless the owner of the agricultural land consents to the condemnation. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:42 am
In construing the claim, the Board found that the Applicant had read too narrowly: [C]laim 1 does not require that the executing at least one corrective action be performed by any particular unit, but merely recites executing at least one corrective action from the array of corrective actions (see claim 1). [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 5:12 pm
(a) As used in this section, "division" refers to the division of family resources established by IC 12-13-1-1. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
Stauffer relies, therefore, does not apply here and does not save his suit from dismissal.Stauffer at *12-13.ConclusionFor the foregoing reasons, we affirm the dismissal of Mr. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:56 pm
Institut Pasteur at *12-13 (text added). [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:28 am
Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:33 pm
Only 18% say current aid levels are about right, while just 12% say the U.S. is providing too little aid. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
Pacific Health Corporation (1/18/12) --- Cal.App.4th ----, 2012 WL 130615, the California Court of Appeal held that denial of class certification in one action does not prevent absent class members from filing a second class action making the same allegations. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:38 am
This is because:1. [read post]
