Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 1881 - 1900 of 6,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm
  Subsequently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, noting that the CDA does not contain a definition of “user,” turned to the plain meaning of the word. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:20 pm
The State did not agree with the defense’s characterization that the court declared a mistrial sua sponteAs noted by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
This case originated on 03/25/11, when I was contacted by Special Agent (SA) Troy Saria, United States Secret Service (USSS), Dallas Field Office, regarding an on-going case in their district involving gas pump skimmers. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Nathaniel Persily
But the degree of inaccuracy varies considerably by state and over time. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
United States, the Court held that the commerce clause power was plenary and not subject to non-textual limitations of state sovereignty. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
§ 1983 against the officers, alleging that they had used excessive force in making the stop, in violation of “rights secured to him under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:10 am by John Gregory
In Ontario College of Pharmacists v. 1724665 Ontario Inc., 2013 CanLII 13655 (ON SC), the court held that a call centre in Ontario that was acting for a company in Belize taking orders for drugs made in China for delivery to patients in the United States was carrying on the practice of pharmacy in Ontario to the degree that the Ontario regulator had jurisdiction over it. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 16-309, involves a question of whether revocation of naturalized citizenship in a criminal proceeding for a false statement during naturalization requires a showing of materiality.McWilliams v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]