Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY" Results 1881 - 1900 of 36,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
"   It is worth noting that despite the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
  The retainer agreement does not always reflect that the attorney is representing both the individual and the corporation, and at the begining it probably means little. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
Hug, 485 F.3d 926, 929 (7th Cir.2007) ("[A]n attorney can bring an appeal on her own behalf when challenging a district court decision imposing monetary sanctions on the attorney, but this rule does not allow an appeal of otherwise critical comments by the district court when no monetary sanctions have been imposed. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
, 105 AD3d at 205; see United States v Doe, 429 F3d 450, 453 [3d Cir]; F.D.I.C. v Ogden Corp. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
AIC originally employed a different  patent attorney, a Mr. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:11 am by admin
  Just because it can be done in one court does not mean it can be done in another court, in another jurisdiction. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged a few days ago about the Doe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
" As for the differences, we won't go into all the details, but practically, the bottom line is that when asking an attorney to render a legal opinion (Does my deep-fryer infringe?) [read post]