Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm
She does so with great depth in both the empirical and theoretical literature. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
No.47/96 Present: 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
If you are assigned to an out-of-state sex offender case, I recommend challenging the proof that the defendant actually is required to register if the offense is pre-1/21/96 and the proof does not show that the sentence continued past the effective date of the statute. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
Dempsey, 96 Mich. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 3:47 am
Ct. 2254, 96 L. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:01 pm
T 488/94, T 169/96 and T 345/98). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Advantage Fund Ltd., 362 F.3d 593, 595-96 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:20 pm
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (1992), 96 D.L.R. (4th) 123, 72 B.C.L.R. (2d) 201 (C.A.) [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:19 am
Fauver, 153 N.J. 80, 96 (1998). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
What implications does this have on the health care system? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:37 am
Where does that leave my son, Edsel? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
” (“The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public,” Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Committee on the Assessment of the United States Drug Safety System, Sept. 26, 2006) The report noted that “FDA does not have adequate resources or procedures for translating preapproval safety signals into effective post-marketing studies, for monitoring and ascertaining the safety of new marketed drugs, for responding promptly to the… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
The Board does not see any reason why the applicant could not do so in response to a notification pursuant to R 51(4), in particular in a situation where, as here, the notification was not preceded by a notification pursuant to A 96(2) EPC 1973 and, therefore, is a “first notification” within the meaning of R 86(3) EPC 1973. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 12:26 pm
Does it take $22,500 or even $80,000 per song to teach a lesson to the infringer? [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
A judgment in from the European Court of Human Rights from February 9 on Richard Anderson v U.K, ruled that the absence of effective court case management in Court of Session proceedings failed to meet the right to a fair trial within the terms of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm
The Court also noted that the need to prove individual damages does not defeat class certification. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:18 am
” [17] He also emphasized that “if the bill that ends up on [his] desk does not meet the test of real reform, [he] will send it back until we get it right. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:02 am
And eventually decide whether you win or he does! [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm
Whether or not sufficient grounds relating to the main request have been submitted is immaterial for the purposes of admissibility of the appeal because an appeal can only be assessed as a whole; see T 382/96 [1]. [read post]
