Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 6,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
“In Jones v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
New York Penal Law 265.01(1), Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon, delineates the type of weapons that are per se, aka, automatically, weapons in New York based on the law no matter how you intended on using them. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
., temporary state-level regulation of privacy matters, a topic she addresses more fully in a forthcoming article on SSRN. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
New York Penal Law 265.01(1), Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon, delineates the type of weapons that are per se, aka, automatically, weapons in New York based on the law no matter how you intended on using them. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:31 pm
He referred the matter to the district attorney’s office, which found insufficient evidence to prosecute Jones. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Jones, [2006] UKHL 16—one of the few domestic cases to consider the crime of aggression. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:04 am
Regrettably, the nature of the business means that accidents, injuries and property damage are inevitable, no matter how well workers do their jobs. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
Jones, supra. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 2:02 pm
As a general matter, lawyers tend to be conservative. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:53 am
“Vanguard One, tell your boss the cops are here to see him,” Sheriff Roy told the drone matter-of-factly. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm
Professor Wax, Judge Jones, and Commissioner-nominee Otis have been and are being attacked for stating the truth in a society that often, as Professor Wax says, "put[s] the quest for psychological comfort over openness on matters central to how our society is organized. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 3:44 am
Of course, irrelevant things like appearance matter. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
Jones faced a life sentence for his alleged crime, but the circuit court agreed with Jones's argument and vacated his sentence. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Jones and Ms. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:08 pm
For this action, however, Jones’ allegations do not “touch matters” related to her employment, let alone have a “significant relationship” to her employment contract. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:34 pm
It's a matter of correctness. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Jones, 443 U.S. 595, and Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, has defined approaches that state courts may apply in determining religious disputes without violating the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:18 am
" Jones v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:18 pm
This particular barrister had earlier acted for Huntingdonshire against Mr & Mrs Jones. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
R v Royal, 2022 ABCA 330 (CanLII) [12] Accordingly, when the Crown took charge of the matter at that point, the matter should have been brought to a superior court judge, not to another provincial court judge. [read post]
