Search for: "J. v. K."
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:09 pm
Concluiu, contudo, pela absolvição de Ayanna Tenório, já que o Plenário julgou improcedente a denúncia contra ela quanto à gestão fraudulenta de instituição financeira (analisada no item V). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Here’s a quick rundown of the codes: A – Uncollected social security or RRTA tax on tips B – Uncollected Medicare tax on tips (but not Additional Medicare Tax) C – Taxable cost of group-term life insurance over $50,000 (included in your wages at boxes 1, 3 and 5) D – Elective deferrals to a section 401(k) cash or deferred arrangement plan (including a SIMPLE 401(k) arrangement) E – Elective deferrals under a section 403(b) salary reduction… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
Here’s a quick rundown of the codes: A – Uncollected social security or RRTA tax on tips B – Uncollected Medicare tax on tips (but not Additional Medicare Tax) C – Taxable cost of group-term life insurance over $50,000 (included in your wages at boxes 1, 3 and 5) D – Elective deferrals to a section 401(k) cash or deferred arrangement plan (including a SIMPLE 401(k) arrangement) E – Elective deferrals under a section 403(b) salary reduction… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Burnyeat J. held that such descriptions - now of individual documents - remained sufficient under the new rule. [26] In Bajic v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
Sims v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
But in a recent case, Conover v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:39 am
Descarga el documento: Zayas Rodríguez v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:01 pm
Williams v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360) US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
In cases involving children, the familiar Article 8/10 judicial “balancing exercise” is conducted with regard to an additional legal principle – that “[w]here the best interests of the child clearly favour a certain course, that course should be followed, unless countervailing reasons of considerable force displace them” (K v News Group Newspapers [2011] 1 WLR 1827, per Ward LJ, [19]). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:16 am
In Holland v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
(j) Control cable abrasion. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Having financed the rise of Maximilian I, Jakob Fugger made considerable contributions to secure the election of the Spanish king Charles I to become Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:23 pm
Read their opinion here: Dewalt v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
Accelerated depreciation for business property on an Indian reservation (sec. 168(j)(8))34. [read post]
