Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 1881 - 1900
of 21,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Belinda Montoya plead guilty to possession of cocaine and was sentenced to fourteen months in a state jail facility. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:52 am
Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
VP Racing Fuels, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:35 pm
In Grapha-Holding AG v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 7:13 am
The following commentary is by Mark Botti, a partner in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The post Update: Stone Brewing v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
Earlier this year the Supreme Court examined the responsibility to appoint counsel in the Texas case Rothgery v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Last week marked the 10th anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision known as Kelo v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:02 pm
State. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:12 am
See Housey Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:05 am
Interestingly, although the parties had not argued this, the court suggested it had jurisdiction to hear the case against Nestlé BV's parent company on the basis of the CJEU's decision in C-617/15 Nike v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
In Hubbert v. [read post]
