Search for: "Plante v. Plante" Results 1881 - 1900 of 5,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Just sit back and relax, as we review the case of Fernandez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
We fired up our V-8 caravan and headed south to Janesville, home of an empty GM plant, worker plight, and Paul Ryan. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:09 pm by David Wagner
Our high level discussion was on the following: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.The 7th Circuit recently held that the lower court properly granted judgment as a matter of law on the age discrimination claim of a plant employee who was fired after several heated disputes with his coworkers.Runyon v Applied Extrusion Techs, Inc, ____F.3d____(7th Cir. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 4:12 am
  The expanded Sunflower plant was expected to release approximately 11 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:28 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
  These amendments are known as the “Holmes Group fix” because they address issues raised by the Supreme Court’s decision in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
EPA's Region V requesting justification for changes made to the State's air pollution control plan. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:45 am
On October 14, 2011 the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:52 am by Jason Shinn
This issue recently played out in a federal district court case of (Siewertsen v Worthington Steel Co, 9-25-2015). [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am by Alyssa Rosen
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]