Search for: "Research In Motion Limited" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,047
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 6:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the Court granted a Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denied a Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in a Limited Tort case. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
Electronics had 2 patents out of the 47, Thomas Licensing S.A. held 4, Bharat Heavy Electrical Held 2, Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc., held 3, Research in Motion Limited held 3 and the others, such as, Samsung, AIIMS, Saint-Gobain, Fujiflims, Honeywell, Bayer, BP Chemicals Limite A British Company, The Secretary, Ministry Of Information, Technology, The Trustees Of Princeton University, PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. and Honda Motors held one patent each. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:09 am by Michelle Yeary
Although courts have acknowledged that plaintiffs might have limited access to crucial information, this Court's research suggests that no courts have let cases enter discovery based on the type of generalized allegations that are present here.Id. at *18-19, 21 (emphasis added) (decision has many useful citations should you be faced with this argument in one of your cases). [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Ron Coleman
I researched this issue extensively for a Very Important Client, and came to the conclusion that, under the right circumstances, liability should, indeed, attach. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
JSTOR is a paid-subscription academic article clearinghouse that colleges make available to students, faculty, researchers, and "walk-in users" (as JSTOR's terms of use call them) who are visiting the campus and using its network and academic resources. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
JSTOR is a paid-subscription academic article clearinghouse that colleges make available to students, faculty, researchers, and "walk-in users" (as JSTOR's terms of use call them) who are visiting the campus and using its network and academic resources. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
[T]he Government does not challenge the soundness of the FTK methodology.Moshlak also reviewed discovery materials provided by the Government to Gardner, and apparently did his own research and investigation . . . [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Knopf
It might be noted that a similar effort by Voltage involving Quebec based ISPs that did not oppose the motion to disclose their clients’ identities fizzled last year for unknown reasons – and with no individuals actually being sued. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
As Cornerstone Research noted in its recent report analyzing the FDIC’s failed bank litigation (refer here), the FDIC tends to file its failed bank lawsuits as the third year anniversary of the bank closure approaches, owing to the applicable three-year statute of limitations. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm by Florian Mueller
Earlier today, InterDigital announced an extension of its wireless patent license agreement with BlackBerry maker Research In Motion "for a multi-year period" and "add[ing] coverage for 4G products, including LTE and LTE-Advanced products". [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 3:46 am by Dennis Crouch
These questions—of whether §112(f) applies; if it does, how the claims should be limited; and then if § 101 permits that narrowed claim—could all be accomplished at early stages of litigation, before expensive discovery and motion practice [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
After receipt of the amici's brief, the court denied the plaintiff's motion, finding that the Ron Paul campaign had failed to plead actionable claims. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
After receipt of the amici's brief, the court denied the plaintiff's motion, finding that the Ron Paul campaign had failed to plead actionable claims. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:26 am by Florian Mueller
For example, when BlackBerry maker Research In Motion refused to pay what Dolby wanted to receive, it sued in the United States and in Germany (and then RIM backed down and paid up).ETRI (of South Korea), Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (of Germany) and Columbia University (of New York City) have other sources of funding (from governments and donators), but when they license their patents, they simply want to get paid at market rates (or above, but not below). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  Resentencing was still required, but limited to the proper imposition of PRC. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The research confirms that firms and recruiters more easily understood persons and characteristics that conform to familiar categories, and penalized those who deviated from them. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
Second, the plaintiffs’ counsel took the initiative by filing an affirmative motion to admit the testimony of their expert witnesses. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:57 am by Florian Mueller
Haft explained that a storage medium has a capacity limit but there is no such thing as a folder-specific capacity limit. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
The other argument is that the prosecution history involves not only documents but also oral communication that cannot be researched or verified later on. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
 . insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss”); Lawrence v. [read post]