Search for: "STATE v. PHILLIPS" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:37 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Douglas J. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
Oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States was held in Florence v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:16 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am by Rob
  This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
This puts him slightly at odds with the government and even with Lord Phillips who have both suggested that mediation should be compulsory or nearly so. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
This puts him slightly at odds with the government and even with Lord Phillips who have both suggested that mediation should be compulsory or nearly so. [read post]