Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am
The worst offender in this regard is American political science, both in the sense of the sub-field that studies the United States and the scholarship and institutions (i.e. political science departments, associations, journals) of the country. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 10:10 am
In Itzkovitch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Parliament has issued a non-binding resolution to the EU Commission to suspend the EU-US privacy shield. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm
Tecmed v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The author analyses the background of the decision and discusses its consequences for the long-standing conflict of procedural laws ( Justizkonflikt) between the United States and Germany. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am
Thanks to these and other efforts, the United States disrupted a concerted effort to undermine the midterm elections. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Under United States Supreme Court precedent, it is relatively easy to sue police officers who commit misconduct, but federal law still provides enormous protections to prosecutors. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
The purpose of the cat’s paw rule, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has stated, is to provide that “an employer cannot shield itself from liability for unlawful termination by using a purportedly independent person or committee as the decision maker where the decision maker merely serves as the conduit, vehicle, or rubber stamp by which another achieves his or her unlawful design. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
The purpose of the cat’s paw rule, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has stated, is to provide that “an employer cannot shield itself from liability for unlawful termination by using a purportedly independent person or committee as the decision maker where the decision maker merely serves as the conduit, vehicle, or rubber stamp by which another achieves his or her unlawful design. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:51 am
In Ross v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
This week a French data protection authority gave Facebook three months to stop tracking non-users’ web activity without their consent and ordered the social network to stop some transfers of personal data to the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
An agent acting—albeit unconstitutionally—in the name of the United States possesses a far greater capacity for harm than an individual trespasser exercising no authority other than his own. [read post]
